"Salvi" (Hope)

"Salvi" (Hope)
Loz. 2008. Acrylic on canvas. Original size 150 x 60 cm

"Dominus Flevit" (The Lord Wept)

"Dominus Flevit" (The Lord Wept)
Loz. 2008. Acrylic on canvas. Original size 70 x 50 cm

Dominus Flevit

Luke 19:41-44

As He drew near and came in sight of [Jerusalem], He shed tears over it and said,

“If you too had only recognized on this day the way to peace! But in fact it is hidden from your eyes! Yes, a time is coming when your enemies will raise fortifications all round you, when they will encircle you and hem you in on every side; they will dash you and the children inside your walls to the ground; they will leave not one stone standing on another within you, because you did not recognize the moment of your visitation.”


Saturday, November 8, 2008

The Sense that Love Makes

Thomas Merton

One thing I must admit: a failure of lucidity in regard to love. It is so easy to assume that love is somehow a solution to a problem. Like: life is a problem which is impossible until someone comes along that you can love. Or, man is himself a problem, solved by love. Love is a key to a hidden answer in us. And so on, but is this true? Or is it only what everybody wants to be true? Maybe love, like everything else, is in large measure absurd. Does love too have to make perfect sense? In what way does it have to?

The sense that love makes, and I think the only sense it makes, is the beloved. The discovery, the revelation of the
absolute value of the one loved. This is not so much a discovery of meaning as a discovery of goodness. To think of love as an answer or a “solution” is to evade the stark directness of this discovery. The fact that you are you is something of absolute value to me. But if I love in a certain way, this becomes covered over and hidden with allthe operations of love, and what happens then is that love takes the place of the beloved. Then love, instead of being a solution (which it is not supposed to be) becomes a problem for which there is no solution. For then love stands in the way between the lovers. It veils the goodness of the beloved. It dresses (or undresses) the beloved as desirable object. Which is all right, too, except that one loves desire instead of the beloved.

The fact that you
are: that you are you. This is all I have left. But it is the whole of love. And nothing can change it.

June 1966, VI. 307

1 comment:

eeeeeedith =) said...

I read this over a couple of times and am still trying to get my head around it!

I think I like what I think it is saying... that people fall in love with the idea of love, and forget to love the person who they are in love with?

Is that what Merton is trying to say? =S